Dating direct faqs
Note: Below are some responses to frequently asked questions that have been posed to us by students, reviewers, and interested scholars.Of course, our responses reflect our views on the state of the field at this moment in time; they will be updated as new data become available.Answering this question typically requires measures of all three constructs, which we refer to as the ideal, the trait, and the evaluation, respectively.There are two ways to compute “match.” The first is the ideal × trait interaction, which captures the extent to which the fit between one ideal trait and the partner’s level of that trait predicts romantic evaluation, over and above the main effect of ideal and the main effect of trait alone. The second approach is that, for each dyad in your sample, you can compute a correlation between a participant’s ideals and a partner’s traits across multiple traits; this approach captures the relative fit between a set of ideals and corresponding traits. These two metrics are independent (Cronbach, 1955, called them elevation and accuracy).
However, there are reasons to think that these sex differences might emerge when people report on potential partners they have never met before (e.g., online dating website profiles).That is, ideal × trait interactions do not reliably predict romantic evaluations.This means that, if I say I really care about extraversion in a partner and you say you do not, extraversion tends to predict evaluations of romantic partners about the same for both of us.Typically, researchers operationalize ideals with respect to traits, such as attractiveness or warmth or extraversion.I might say that I want a partner who is especially extraverted, whereas you might say you want a partner who is not especially extraverted.